when there aremany philosophies.

i am agree  with the both writers those have given their opinions. please i want know that every individual has his open philosophy and thoughts, experiences, approach to the subject so why we accepting the Hindu, Jain, Buddha, Sikh Muslim, Christianity  etc. here is also charavak etc 6 darshans.either we ignore the and establish our own individual . there must be first some standardization. like wise we first learn physiology and then pathology. every individual has conflicts. either we respect the opinions of other or to impose you decision on other. self experiences are truly varies.suppose i am  a sugar patient so i take my tea without sugar  it gives me pleasant other  dislikes or want more and more sugar. if you will take sweet and after that you will take tea with sugar so you will feel that a tea is without taste of sugar.my submission was that established philosophies are sufficient or not?it not need of new philosophies? who will respect or follow?every intellectual has power  to establish or create his own philosophy and he may be correct up to the marks but there must be standardization?who will do it? if one will do another will accept or not.is there any recognized institution at present which can follow or accept my opinions .?these are my thoughts may be right or wrong.